<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ibrander &#187; dan heath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibrander.org/tag/dan-heath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibrander.org</link>
	<description>creative leadership for the digital brand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Remember to Forget</title>
		<link>http://www.ibrander.org/2009/11/remember-to-forget/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.ibrander.org/2009/11/remember-to-forget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>russell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[brand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copy writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan heath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Made to Stick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibrander.org/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a refreshingly simple and cogent commentary from Dan Heath, co-author of Made to Stick, in a chat with Fast Company on how to think about conveying innovation.
&#160;
We are currently working with a smart new brand bringing a terrific innovation to the senior living market. Even though it is substantially different in terms of features [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a refreshingly simple and cogent commentary from Dan Heath, co-author of <em>Made to Stick</em>, in a chat with <em>Fast Company </em>on how to think about conveying innovation.</p>
<br /><img src="http://www.ibrander.org/wp-content/uploads/innovation.png" alt="media" /><br />

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We are currently working with a smart new brand bringing a terrific innovation to the senior living market. Even though it is substantially different in terms of features and benefits, its relationship to the Personal Emergency Response System devices (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dc4T6tBs3mg" rel="shadowbox[post-58];player=swf;width=640;height=385;" target="_blank">I&#8217;ve fallen and I can&#8217;t get up!</a>) is close enough that the comparison is vital to speeding understanding of the offer.</p>
<p>I think the key here is that short cuts are critical to capturing attention and identifying a familiar category or reference point. All too often, though, business owners or product managers reject the notion because it&#8217;s an approach that doesn&#8217;t feel complete or accurate enough. That&#8217;s <em>brand out</em> thinking rather than <em>brand in</em> thinking, and it&#8217;s a big mistake. The more nuanced and comprehensive you try to make lead messages, the longer and more convoluted they become to your audience, and you lose them before you&#8217;ve even gotten their attention. </p>
<p>Remember to forget. Forget all the features and details you know about your offering &#8212; pretend to be ignorant &#8212; before you evaluate the impact of a lead message. And remember the purpose of a lead message: It&#8217;s not to explain but to generate interest in more information with a trim equation of familiar + different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ibrander.org/2009/11/remember-to-forget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
